OPINION: VOD or DVD
By Paul Sweeting -- Video Business,04/03/2009
APRIL 3 | WASHINGTON—Time was, when you went to a cable television convention, you’d hear a lot of talk about DVD, usually from cable operators complaining that they needed a better video-on-demand window, while programmers tried to change the subject.
Paul Sweeting is editor of Content Agenda
At Cable Show 2009 here last week, however, there was plenty of talk of windows but nary a word about DVD (or Blu-ray Disc).
One reason for the change, to be sure, is that in many cases, cable operators have gotten the better VOD window they wanted. But given the main thrust of the conversation at this year’s show, the lack of attention to optical discs was striking.
The cable industry today is embroiled in a critical and consuming debate over the appropriate role of free Internet streaming of content in the future of the business.
While the free-to-air broadcast networks have moved aggressively to make their programs available online, usually soon after their initial airing, cable-network programmers have been much more cautious about embracing free streaming.
Unlike broadcast networks, which rely entirely on advertising for their revenue, cable networks get roughly half their revenue from cable operators in the form of per-subscriber “carriage” fees.
Making their original series available for free online, many fear, will undermine the cable TV subscription model and ultimately lead to a loss of carriage fees.
“Putting full-length episodes online is a bad model as it is implemented now,” Rainbow Media Holdings president Josh Sapan said during a panel discussion titled “Jumping Though Hulu Hoops.” “It creates bad habits, especially with younger viewers. It is a practice that doesn’t provide an economic reward and compromises the model that creates great TV.”
Others in the industry, however, most vocally Time Warner chairman/CEO Jeff Bewkes, think they have a solution: make original cable series available online but only to people who also subscribe to cable or satellite TV, thus preserving the dual revenue stream model.
Click here to read the rest of the column on ContentAgenda.
Post a comment Return to article View other article discussions
| Submitted by: | Alan Leung 4/9/2009 5:33:47 PM PT |
| Location: | San Francisco |
| Occupation: | Restaurant |
If Disney chairman/CEO Bob Iger has his way, they can kiss goodbye to all the tv-dvd sales and income.
| Submitted by: | Khuram Rashid (kappa_rash@yahoo.com) 4/6/2009 4:54:39 AM PT |
| Location: | London, United Kingdom |
| Occupation: | Marketing/web content writer |
It is interesting how everyone mentions 'internet tv' when they really mean VOD. Watching TV online does not mean going on hulu and grabbing video streams of shows you choose to watch, its about viewing live streaming channels in real-time. There are many aggregators out there that make it easier to find and view these streams, such as www.viewmy.tv. The problem is that live streaming content is also being financially reviewed which results in slim pickings. VOD is great and its convenience beats DVD but in terms of quality and value for money DVD's beat all. An extention to the argument, HD is not better, CGI effects are too obvious unlike on DVDs. If anyone brought the Heroes box set on HD knows what I mean.
Post a comment Return to article View other article discussions
