VB Mobile Log In  |  Register          
Advertisement
Subscribe to VB Magazine
Email
Learn RSS

BETWEEN THE LINES   



Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)


InDemand touts day-and-date VOD

August 27, 2009

I conveyed in a piece last week the position of some studios that VOD, not Redbox, provides the ultimate in consumer convenience, at a price not that much higher than the average kiosk rental.

I was quickly corrected by an email from a loyal retail reader, who pointed out that in his market, Comcast charges $4.99 for VOD, not the $3 to $4 I had tossed out. Maybe that’s why VOD isn’t taking off, he wrote.

Pricing certainly has something to do with demand for VOD, as does the fact, that cable operators don’t market VOD very well. While this may be good news for physical rental stores, it’s frustrating to studios who would like to see more rentals go digital.

This industry discussion must be burning the ears of some VOD execs, if a new press release from InDemand is any indication.

The PPV and VOD provider blasted out a message about the “hit” movies that in September will bow on VOD the same day as DVD, among them State of Play (Universal), Next Day Air (Summit), Observe and Report (Warner), Ghosts of Girlfriends Past (Warner), The Brothers Bloom (Summit) and Away We Go (Universal). Hit being a relative term, of course.

It also named the titles coming to VOD in September, but not on the same day as DVD, and other recent major movies that have been on VOD.

Certainly some marketing effort being put in here.

In addition, VOD providers and cable systems have more to market than in the past—InDemand estimates that more than 100 titles will be day-and-date with physical media this year, up a third from 73 simultaneous releases in 2008. In 2007, only 15 titles were on VOD and DVD at the same time, the company said.

More than 40 million digital cable subscribers had access to VOD at the start of 2009, InDemand said, citing Leichtman Research Group.

That still leaves tens of millions of homes without VOD. Good thing those people can get movies, from Netflix, Redbox, Blockbuster, a local store or via the Internet.

It’s an increasingly fragmented world in terms of movie delivery to consumers. Redbox’s growth doesn’t sit well with everybody. Neither does the growth of VOD. But that’s complexity of the expanded “home entertainment window.”


Posted by Marcy Magiera on August 27, 2009 | Comments (1)


Email
Learn RSS


August 31, 2009
In response to: InDemand touts day-and-date VOD
Video Guy commented:

Red Box and NetFlix had devalued the movies a point that no real video store or paid digital service can see enough profits to maintain their business model. Netflix by far devalues rentals over any other outlet. Netflix concept at $16.99 makes them impossible to compete against. So what studio are seeing today with declining sales, most video rentailer saw that about three years ago; hence the diminishing video stores around the nation. Studios want to fix the market, focus on those red envelopes. People buy movies because they use to calculate $5 to rent it or $15-$17 to buy. Usually, high percentage ended up buying it, well, with Netflix, its $16.99 for three movies unlimited. So instead of buying that copy now, they just wait till is show up in their mail. If they don’t like it, it’s returned right away, if they like it, they wait till it’s a clearance item to buy, hence the double digit decline in sales. Why would you buy a New Car that's $25k with $357 a month loan, if someone rents you that same exact car for $100 a month unlimited miles? There would be less value in the ownership of the car versus renting it, if you do the math.

I believe the movie industry needs a better analysts working on their staff. I suggest they do some analysis on retail stores return ratio against initial procurement to see the overall impact on their bottom lines. DVDs are cheap to produce, but devaluation of that product makes it impossible to capitalize on it’s perimium, which in this case is entertainment itself. I work for a fortune 500-company as the top analyst and from experience I can say that most companies rather sacrifice potential customer that devalues their product to less then the cost of bottle of soda, then to settle for loss leader strategies.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

Advertisement

Advertisements





©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites