Login  |  Register          
Advertisement
BETWEEN THE LINES   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (2)


Rental’s fortunes swing
June 22, 2007

What a difference a week makes in the respect accorded the rental business. Two weeks ago, Time Warner execs dissed rental as an inefficient distribution model and less profitable for studios than VOD.

Then last week—just seven short days later—rental was looking as important as it was 10 years ago.

What happened? Blockbuster announced it would expand Blu-ray Discs only in 1,450 new stores, while leaving HD DVD in just 250 stores where both formats have been tested since last fall.

That prompted Sony home entertainment chief David Bishop to predict “this is really the beginning of the end” of the format war and, by extension, HD DVD. Fox chief Mike Dunn called the Blockbuster move “a true development” and “a big, big milestone.”

Self-serving? Of course. These guys have been calling the format war over since CES in January. But their comments suggest that rental stores are an important vehicle in launching a high-tech and expensive new format.

How true that is depends on how you measure importance. From a strict sales standpoint, Blockbuster will carry 170 BD titles an average of a couple of units deep in 1,700 stores. That could amount to a half-million units or so sold into Blockbuster by the BD studios. Nothing to sneeze at at this fledgling point in the format’s development, but certainly not enough to run the other guys out of business.

In addition, analysts suggest that people affluent enough to have already jumped into high-def players tend to buy not rent, raising a question about how the BD titles will turn in stores.

But from a consumer marketing standpoint, the deal carries much more significance.

Blu-ray will have a relatively large presence in those 1,450 stores, with no presence at all for HD DVD, suggesting to consumers—especially those in the “early majority” most likely to buy players during the fourth quarter—that one format has, as the studio heads suggest, already won the war.

The Warner comments on rental vs. VOD and the BD studios’ stance on the importance of the country’s largest rental chain in speeding consumer acceptance of BD are separate and unrelated.

But taken together, they do create an interesting and, I would say, fairly accurate picture of the rental market today.

As a distribution model, it may be inefficient, and there certainly are more profitable distribution channels for studios today.

But as far as reaching consumers, it is still large and powerful, generating $8 billion a year in consumer spending. For many consumers, it is part of the fabric of their lives, and seeing a product “endorsed” there, even implicitly, may carry more weight even than seeing it on the shelves at Wal-Mart.

Posted by Marcy Magiera on June 22, 2007 | Comments (2)


June 26, 2007
In response to: Rental’s fortunes swing
Tom Paine commented:

Thank you Marcy for finally clearly all the underbrush and reminding the industry of what the forest looks like. Consumers clearly prefer the tangible, reliable DVD. Rental has a nd still is generating huge sums of money to the studios. So thank you for differentiating posturing from meaningful acions.




June 28, 2007
In response to: Rental’s fortunes swing
Adrian Hickman commented:

Marcy, thank you for looking beyond the "quotes" and analysing the story from all sides. It has been a very thought provoking analysis by you. Jim's letter makes many very valid statements. Rental has driven the adoption of every technological advance in home video: VHS took off when rental began [Laserdisc fizzled becuase it never became a rental item]; against Warren Lieberfarbs best efforts, rental lead the growth of DVD to an amazing industry, and now, Hollywood is being given signs again that, if they want to see BluRay adopted now, instead of possibly a few years in the future, they need to stop looking at rental myopicaly as some money out of their pocket. Rental, combined with a healthy sale market, will propel this industry for years to come, and their pockets won't be big enough to contain the potential profits.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements





©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites