Login  |  Register          
Advertisement
FirstLight
Subscribe to VB Magazine
THE DOWN LOW   


Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (0)


Online Video Code Fights for Freedom
July 8, 2008

Don’t count American University among the online-video fun police.

The university’s Center for Social Media yesterday put out a so-called Best Practices Code for what it says outlines what’s “fair” and what’s not in terms of online-video posts. The document’s likely a response to the proliferation of video posts and views, as U.S. viewers are watching about 65% more online videos than they did a year ago (doesn’t anyone work anymore?).

The code is also especially apropos in light of the $1 billion lawsuit MTV parent Viacom filed against YouTube last year, claiming that the Google unit doesn’t do enough to prevent copyrighted material from being posted.

So, according to the University’s code, this is what flies, in English:

  • You should feel free to post Kajagoogo’s Too Shy video as part of a tribute to righteous ‘80s band hairstyles.
  • Wanna use a clip from Resident Evil: Apocalypse to comment that we live in one violent society? You shouldn’t get beat up for it.
  • Just because At Last is playing in the background of the video of your first wedding dance doesn’t mean you should have to pay Etta James’ publisher for it.
  • You might regret posting footage of you dancing drunkenly at a Jimmy Buffett concert, but you shouldn’t get sued for it.
  • Not a fan of Radiohead’s High and Dry video and want to headline it with “Worst Video Ever?” You may not have taste, but you shouldn’t have a legal bill either.
  • No one should be able to tell you that you can’t intersperse footage of the Beastie Boys, Eleanor Roosevelt, Deacon Jones and the Bolshoi Ballet to create a visual statement about why the Vietnam War was a bad idea.
The code also has a “limitations” section attempting to spell out what crosses the line using what appear to be pretty vague standards. So as for what doesn’t fly? I’m still trying to figure that out. But I’m sure Viacom’s legal counsel would be more than willing to spell that out.

Posted by Danny King on July 8, 2008 | Comments (0)



POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:


Advertisement

Advertisements





©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
" target="_blank">Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites